skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Gendal World
SOA... Travel... Consulting... Life... Economics... IT
Sunday, October 16, 2005
How did we do?
It's that time of the quarter again.... we
announce our 3Q results
tomorrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Richard Brown
View my complete profile
Blog Archive
►
2009
(14)
►
May
(2)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
February
(3)
►
January
(6)
►
2008
(46)
►
December
(3)
►
November
(3)
►
October
(3)
►
August
(5)
►
July
(7)
►
June
(2)
►
May
(7)
►
April
(4)
►
March
(4)
►
February
(5)
►
January
(3)
►
2007
(92)
►
December
(2)
►
November
(10)
►
October
(8)
►
September
(7)
►
August
(6)
►
July
(2)
►
June
(4)
►
May
(10)
►
April
(3)
►
March
(16)
►
February
(12)
►
January
(12)
►
2006
(395)
►
December
(20)
►
November
(40)
►
October
(57)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(41)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(45)
►
May
(39)
►
April
(34)
►
March
(29)
►
February
(18)
►
January
(19)
▼
2005
(163)
►
December
(18)
►
November
(25)
▼
October
(24)
It's not just about the technology
Everything I thought I knew turned out to be wrong
RadioEconomics
Customer Data Integration
Oh dear...
Investment Update
Düsseldorf
Fascinating article on why countries in turmoil ro...
Is anecdotal evidence the best kind?
Chance encounter suggests Wikipedia malaise is wid...
How did we do? The Answer
The Wikipedia Backlash
How did we do?
All Kneel!
Lottery Syndicates
Back!
Woo!
London Science Museum
What is it I do? (part 2)
Google AdWords fun, plus a partial answer to a que...
The New York Times agree with me (sort of)
Holiday Reading
It's only 79p!
Perhaps religious groups work to a different finan...
►
September
(21)
►
August
(18)
►
July
(29)
►
June
(25)
►
January
(3)
►
2004
(3)
►
December
(3)
Links
Adam Smith Institute
Adrian Spender
Andrew Ferrier
Cafe Hayek
David Currie
Ed Brill
Enemy Radar
IBM Software Support
James Governor
MQSeries.net
Raymond Chen
The Lost Outpost
Tim Worstall
WebSphere news from Google
Hit count
Disclaimer
The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions
No comments:
Post a Comment